Talk:Andrewlandon

Deletion
This article is in the list for deletion. The neutrality, as well as the proclamations without such "hacking" and "stealing" evidences is thereby discriminatory. Please discuss with us, and share your opinion whether this page must be deleted or not. - Adminguy 04:55, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

If I went through and changed the language, would it be more acceptable? I mean, i've tried to keep it neutral, and there is proof so it isn't as if someone just created a hate page for the guy. 71.222.218.100 22:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The actual songs
I believe that much more effort should be put into information about --23:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)RolandtheWrong
 * The artists that have already been identified. We could include things such as where they are, what type of music they play, other artists that they've worked with, albums, etc. (after all, andrew landon's basically a compilation, right?)
 * The songs that haven't been identified. Is the chart descriptive enough? I know there are quite a few on here, but there are also a lot more on limewire, AL fan myspace pages, the internet, etc. that aren't acknowledged on the list.

Kyle Williams from IMadeThisMistake was one of the artists he has in fact stolen music from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI4a_bzffbI

Neutrality is still disputable
I've thoroughly read through the article and it affects me and my friend's personally. This is accusing a man of stealing MP3's from underground artists. I can understand some sound similar, but they are NOT stolen property. Haven't you heard a song where it sounds like another? I've got lots of music by completely different artists and they just happen to sound similar. Get off of his case. Please delete this page. It's still offensive and harassment towards my friend. Unsigned comment from 174.48.96.252


 * The language has been edited so that this page isn't mistaken for an attack page, and if you click edit, you'll see that there is a hidden message advising everyone that adds new information to keep it as neautral as possible. You seem to be missing the point of this page. As I just said, the page isn't meant to attack a person, but to provide information on the songs that have been proven to be a completely different artist's work.


 * It isn't impossbile that such diverse songs-- those with different vocal registers, recording qualities, instrument style and usage, composition technique, and lyrical technique-- are the work of one solo artist (one who has never credited other artists for contribution), it's just very improbable. Likewise, that what's said on the page and in references-- by andrewlandon fans, fans of other artists, and other artist themselves-- that the great and diverse music is in fact by great and diverse musicians is much more probable.
 * The artists that have been recognized as the original artists do not appear out of the blue and say, "Hey! Er, yeah, this andrewlandon guy, he's been stealing music from my page and uploading it onto his own," these artists have history and notablity that says they are in fact musicians. Ryan Adams, Good Luck Elijah, and Symphony in G, three bands mentioned in the article all have history, notability, and proof that they are real musicians.
 * Ryan Alexander has recorded 3 or 4 albums, all that are sold online and with the help of his record label, and interview with New Times, videos of himself playing live.
 * Goodluck, Elijah has been been uploaded onto youtube by a fan while they played live (in fact, they played a song that andrewlandon has never accused a hacker of uploading onto his myspace: To Whom it May Concern http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7w_r1BzU5YQ)
 * Symphony in G is still creating music. They have 3 or four songs that AL has claimed as his, except these songs sound like everything they've recorded and ARE recording, plus, they've openly accused andrewlandon of breaching their contract.

http://www.purevolume.com/symphonying <---Read their updates from last November, also, look at the healthy collection of homogenius recordings they have.
 * What does andrewlandon have? A myspace account, too many too diverse songs that are claimed to be others, controversal videos of an entirely different person (Seth McGaha) made to look like Andrewlandon, and a private twitter account.
 * In different words, if musician A, who has a fan base, a discography, a touring date, live videos, a connection with his fans, etc., claims that musician B has stolen a song that was on musician A's profile for months and matches his other art, you do research. If you then discover that musician B has a song on his profile that is every way identical to the song musician A said was stolen from him, you can conclude that musician A was in fact telling the truth.
 * Also, please sign your posts by either typing '- - ~ ~ ~ ~' without the spaces, or clicking on the button that has a picture of a singature on it above the text box.

--71.222.231.131 19:48, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

The Fact of the matter is an Artist has Copyright of his work once it is in a tangible form of expression, This page had More than enough information. Besides Most of the artist's here do have their works registered and are willing to go to court. One Artist tried but in fact nothing happened since Andrew Landon is not a REAL person. So this page is causing emotional stress to a person, they do not have the right to have this page deleted. They must go through the necessary steps to do so and those steps are through the law. Sidenote: What about all the emotional stress "AndrewLandon" put on these artist and their families/friends? This is a site for free speech, and this is factual information that can NOT be taken down on the whim of a single unknown person. If they really have a problem, they can have their lawyer contact any of ours.